Charges associated with a potential term #
i. Overview #
In this module we give the multiset of charges associated with a given type of potential term, given a charge spectrum.
We will define two versions of this, one based on the underlying fields on the
potentials, and the charges that they carry, and one more explicit version which
is faster to compute with. The former is ofPotentialTerm
, and the latter is
ofPotentialTerm'
.
We will show that these two multisets have the same elements.
ii. Key results #
ofPotentialTerm
: The multiset of charges associated with a potential term, defined in terms of the fields making up that potential term, given a charge spectrum.ofPotentialTerm'
: The multiset of charges associated with a potential term, defined explicitly, given a charge spectrum.
iii. Table of contents #
- A. Charges of a potential term from field labels
- A.1. Monotonicity of
ofPotentialTerm
- A.2. Charges of potential terms for the empty charge spectrum
- A.1. Monotonicity of
- B. Explicit construction of charges of a potential term
- B.1. Explicit multisets for
ofPotentialTerm'
- B.2.
ofPotentialTerm'
on the empty charge spectrum
- B.1. Explicit multisets for
- C. Relation between two constructions of charges of potential terms
- C.1. Showing that
ofPotentialTerm
is a subset ofofPotentialTerm'
- C.2. Showing that
ofPotentialTerm'
is a subset ofofPotentialTerm
- C.3. Equivalence of elements of
ofPotentialTerm
andofPotentialTerm'
- C.4. Induced monoticity of
ofPotentialTerm'
- C.1. Showing that
iv. References #
There are no known references for this material.
A. Charges of a potential term from field labels #
We first define ofPotentialTerm
, and prover properites of it.
This is slow to compute in practice.
Given a charges x : Charges
associated to the representations, and a potential
term T
, the charges associated with instances of that potential term.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A.1. Monotonicity of ofPotentialTerm
#
We show that ofPotentialTerm
is monotone in its charge spectrum argument.
That is if x ⊆ y
then ofPotentialTerm x T ⊆ ofPotentialTerm y T
.
A.2. Charges of potential terms for the empty charge spectrum #
For the empty charge spectrum, the charges associated with any potential term is empty.
B. Explicit construction of charges of a potential term #
We now turn to a more explicit construction of the charges associated with a potential term. This is faster to compute with, but less obviously connected to the underlying fields.
Given a charges x : ChargeSpectrum
associated to the representations, and a potential
term T
, the charges associated with instances of that potential term.
This is a more explicit form of PotentialTerm
, which has the benifit that
it is quick with decide
, but it is not defined based on more fundamental
concepts, like ofPotentialTerm
is.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.μ = match y.qHd, y.qHu with | none, x => ∅ | x, none => ∅ | some qHd, some qHu => {qHd - qHu}
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.β = match y.qHu with | none => ∅ | some qHu => Multiset.map (fun (x : 𝓩) => -qHu + x) y.Q5.val
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.Λ = Multiset.map (fun (x : 𝓩 × 𝓩 × 𝓩) => x.1 + x.2.1 + x.2.2) (y.Q5.product (y.Q5.product y.Q10)).val
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.W1 = Multiset.map (fun (x : 𝓩 × 𝓩 × 𝓩 × 𝓩) => x.1 + x.2.1 + x.2.2.1 + x.2.2.2) (y.Q5.product (y.Q10.product (y.Q10.product y.Q10))).val
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.W3 = match y.qHu with | none => ∅ | some qHu => Multiset.map (fun (x : 𝓩 × 𝓩) => -qHu - qHu + x.1 + x.2) (y.Q5.product y.Q5).val
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.K1 = Multiset.map (fun (x : 𝓩 × 𝓩 × 𝓩) => -x.1 + x.2.1 + x.2.2) (y.Q5.product (y.Q10.product y.Q10)).val
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.K2 = match y.qHd, y.qHu with | none, x => ∅ | x, none => ∅ | some qHd, some qHu => Multiset.map (fun (x : 𝓩) => qHd + qHu + x) y.Q10.val
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.topYukawa = match y.qHu with | none => ∅ | some qHu => Multiset.map (fun (x : 𝓩 × 𝓩) => -qHu + x.1 + x.2) (y.Q10.product y.Q10).val
- y.ofPotentialTerm' SuperSymmetry.SU5.PotentialTerm.bottomYukawa = match y.qHd with | none => ∅ | some qHd => Multiset.map (fun (x : 𝓩 × 𝓩) => qHd + x.1 + x.2) (y.Q5.product y.Q10).val
Instances For
B.1. Explicit multisets for ofPotentialTerm'
#
For each potential term, we give an explicit form of the multiset ofPotentialTerm'
.
B.2. ofPotentialTerm'
on the empty charge spectrum #
We show that for the empty charge spectrum, the charges associated with any potential term is empty,
as defined through ofPotentialTerm'
.
C. Relation between two constructions of charges of potential terms #
We now give the relation between ofPotentialTerm
and ofPotentialTerm'
.
We show that they have the same elements, by showing that they are subsets of each other.
The prove of some of these results are rather long since they involve explicit
case analysis for each potential term, due to the nature of the definition
of ofPotentialTerm'
.
C.1. Showing that ofPotentialTerm
is a subset of ofPotentialTerm'
#
We first show that ofPotentialTerm
is a subset of ofPotentialTerm'
.
C.2. Showing that ofPotentialTerm'
is a subset of ofPotentialTerm
#
We now show the other direction of the subset relation, that
ofPotentialTerm'
is a subset of ofPotentialTerm
.
C.3. Equivalence of elements of ofPotentialTerm
and ofPotentialTerm'
#
We now show that a charge is in ofPotentialTerm
if and only if it is in
ofPotentialTerm'
. I.e. their underlying finite sets are equal.
We do not say anything about the multiplicity of elements within the multisets,
which is not important for us.
C.4. Induced monoticity of ofPotentialTerm'
#
Due to the equivalence of elements of ofPotentialTerm
and ofPotentialTerm'
,
we can now also show that ofPotentialTerm'
is monotone in its charge spectrum argument.